Model each club with its real capacity
Load every club, society or extracurricular with a hard membership cap, optional category quotas, and any eligibility gates (year of study, department, prior experience).
Clubs & societies
Student clubs, cultural societies and extracurriculars have the same shape as electives: limited seats, ranked preferences, eligibility rules, and a result students will contest. Allotix runs club allocation on the same preference-based engine — so the cultural committee stops refereeing WhatsApp lists and starts publishing a fair allotment.
Popular clubs fill by who messaged first or who knows the coordinator. Membership caps get breached, quieter students get left out, and there is no record when someone asks why they were refused.
How it works
Load every club, society or extracurricular with a hard membership cap, optional category quotas, and any eligibility gates (year of study, department, prior experience).
Students rank the clubs they are eligible for. Submitting on day one confers no advantage over day last — which removes the stampede and the informal queue.
Run allocation in a stated priority order — merit, seniority, lottery, or a rule your institution agrees — fill each club to its cap, and publish outcomes with the deciding rule attached.
What you get
FAQ
Club allocation is the process of assigning students to limited-capacity clubs, societies and extracurriculars based on the preferences they submit. Because popular clubs have hard membership caps and demand is uneven, allotment is a capacity-constrained matching problem — the same shape as open elective or internship slot allocation.
Yes. Eligibility rules are evaluated before preference collection, so a club that is only open to second-year students, or to a specific department, never appears in an ineligible student's list and cannot be allotted to them.
No. The priority basis is configurable. Many institutions use year of study, a lottery among equal-priority students, or a seniority rotation so the same cohort does not always fill the popular clubs. Whatever rule you choose is published with the result, which is what makes the outcome defensible.
Mechanically, no — both are ranked preferences against capacity with eligibility gates. Club allocation is the same engine pointed at societies and extracurriculars instead of courses: membership caps instead of seat matrices, club coordinators instead of instructors, and a priority rule suited to student activities rather than academic merit alone.
The classic: rank the electives, respect the seat matrix, publish a defensible result.
Split a cohort into sections, lab groups or tutorial batches under real capacity limits.
Allot students to internship, industrial training and placement slots against real seat caps.