Set supervisor capacity and domains
Each guide gets a hard load cap and a research domain, so students are matched against real availability rather than a rumour.
Projects & supervisors
Every final year opens with the same scramble: students chasing the popular guides, guides quietly overcommitting, and a coordinator refereeing it all over email. It is a matching problem with capacity limits, which means it is an Allotix problem.
Guide allotment is decided in corridors and WhatsApp groups. The students with the best networks get the best supervisors, and the coordinator absorbs every complaint.
How it works
Each guide gets a hard load cap and a research domain, so students are matched against real availability rather than a rumour.
Students submit a ranked list of supervisors or project topics they would accept, with eligibility gates where a guide requires specific coursework.
The engine allots in merit order against supervisor capacity, and every student and guide receives the outcome in writing.
What you get
FAQ
Two-sided preference matching is on the roadmap. Today, guides set a hard load cap and an eligibility gate, and students submit ranked preferences — which already removes the oversubscription and the politics. If two-sided matching is a requirement for your department, tell us during the demo; it directly shapes what we build next.
Allot students to internship, industrial training and placement slots against real seat caps.
Allot students to specialisations, streams or a branch change on merit and preference.
The classic: rank the electives, respect the seat matrix, publish a defensible result.